Versions Compared

Version Old Version 2 New Version Current
Changes made by

ThomasS

ThomasS

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Goals

  • This meeting is to prepare and provide OSE initiatives input from all team meetings for OSE Governance.

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes


Maglev BlockersLeo Zhang

Pipeline code is merged - switch Jenkins from old fashion to new pipeline , monitoring any blocking issues

- reference Former user (Deleted) email - Need solution - increase timeout - PR merge tomorrow RAC-4552

VLAB team has provided feedback to the VLAB training modules - Will update


MonoRail BlockersPaul Scharlach
Chef for Dell EMC - Peter wants the PR merged RAC-4146

this is the PR:
https://github.com/RackHD/on-taskgraph/pull/222

OK


Mustangs BlockersFormer user (Deleted)
Demo

Demoed for power monitoring microservice running into issues -

Replacement pollers -

Demoed to Former user (Deleted) and

azzam Tannous helping out

Michael Gregoire Tom Capirchio will set priority.


Longhorn Blockers
NA

Corsair BlockersFormer user (Deleted)
NA
OK - DoJo up and running, Former user (Deleted)is the anchor (work with PO , meetings, assignments), PO is Former user (Deleted)

Stryker BlockersAmy Mullins
Redfish schema misses - escalating to Jon Hass
OK

Gripen BlockersAmy Mullins
CC need to be more responsive
OK

Scrumwagon BlockersAmy Mullins
NA
OK





Core CommittersRod
Jeanne and Peter multiple meetings per dayESMArchitecture meeting scheduled with Former user (Deleted)
  Quality Board Amy
  • This sprint
    • Working on stable Pipeline
    • Put in parallel testing to get regression under an hour
    • Look at pipeline for each team.
    • Amy Mullins   QB will post a confluence page on pipeline. ALl teams to contribute
    • Can we get rid of Travis going forward (runs unit test and pushes packages)?
    • Leo Zhang  will provide a Travis recommendation.
    • Future RI for a Jenkins pipeline being portable for the community?
    • Viability of the pipeline. Cross team meeting to be held beginning of next sprint Amy Mullins  
    • Period reports not working yet
  • OK - Week of the 30th will have a pipeline session

ESM / ServiceNOW
Architecture meeting scheduled with Michael Hepfer. Had a RackHD deep dive. Right now RackHD is gathering some genealogy. Looking at expanding RackHD and EOS Service Now adapter (Need to be open source) capabilities.

Architecture BoardJoeNA

Product Management / Backlog RefinementTom Cap
NA
  • Owners for Cisco switches RI
    • RIs have been in limbo for months due to confusion between what Symphony team was doing and if it could be leveraged
    • It was decided a few weeks back, the Symphony solution would not align with RackHD Core (different language and different data model), would need to rewrite this for RackHD Core
    • Paul Scharlachwill talk to Tim to see about next steps
  • RackHD demo example is broken
    • Tom Capirchio had conversations with several potential customers (ACM, Intel, System Engineering, etc…) who want to try RackHD demo environment. Demo environment is unreliable and the webui is broken.
    • Paul Scharlach will help identify where the problems are
  • GUI – next steps?
    • Stephen Scaringella, Tim Larson and Tom Capirchio met with Tom Deelman a few weeks back. Team agreed to leverage Tom D’s team to scope and size work to deliver a RackHD GUI based on Dell Clarity.
    • Tom Capirchio to bring this up at OSE Governance – who owns this? What are the next steps? 

New Sprint Demo model

  • Provide a posted video for a complete
  • Internal point videos for new threads of functionality
  • Need to identify RI consumers
  • Give drop to consumers and get feedback
Team

Thomas Sullivan  develop a new sprint demo proposal


RIs without consumers? - should we start or continue.



Other - Rotating Slack channel responsibilities


Other - ProcessTom SCentralize Continuous Delivery to one confluence page

Other - Process
  • RI-137 RackHD Continuous deployment readiness

Other - Enforce fixed version/s and resolution fields

Issue: Went through the RAC database in the last week and identified that the fixed version/s and resolution fields are not being filled out which impacts reporting.

Proposal: Put enforcement that requires fixed version/s and resolution fields to be filled out.

fixed version/s field: Set when or before the sprint is started, change if does not make the sprint.

Resolution values of

    • Fixed  should it should just be Done - fixed version/s = "Version"
    • Won't Do version/s=NA
    • Duplicate fixed version/s= NA    
    • Invalid   fixed version/s= NA
    • Done fixed version/s= "Version"
    • Cancelled fixed version/s= NA

Other - Knowledge DatabaseTom SNo action to date

Other - Remove GitHub IssuesTom S

Will remove issues from GitHub once the webportal and RackHD/RackHD changes are in place


Other - EquipmentAmy

Need more equipment for test equipment -sharing dev and test -Is there budget ,< $25 K